Physical research has the task to describe in detail the mechanisms how all interactions in universe occur and to define generally valid physical rules, called laws of nature, by which the interactions can be logically explained.

The axiom for physics is that the universe is physical reality.

B1.1.2 The Definition of physical Reality

Reality is correctly defined in Wikipedia:

Reality is everything that exists, which means that is not imaginary.

This implies:

Physical reality is everything that physically exist.

Requirements for physical reality are:

* Everything in universe are objects, which are describable by accurate 3-dimensional structures and concrete relative locality.

* Physical interactions of objects are observable by suitable detectors.

* All statements concerning physical interactions are refutable, but can’t be refuted.

* All statements concerning physical interactions are unambiguous and without any inconsistencies.

By this, “the universe is physical reality” means:

* Everything in universe consists of objects (=matter), which occupy a 3-dimensional volume and do physically possible (=mechanical) interactions.

* All physical quantities refer to physically describable properties of objects/ particles, which means that for example all energies, all forces, heat and pressure refer to properties of particles.

* All interactions in universe refer to interactions of objects which are physically possible, physically describable and logically explainable.

* All interactions in universe refer to impacts of relative kinetic energies by contacts, mostly collisions, with subsequent superposition of objects.

Everything which fulfills not above criteria, is physically impossible, imaginary and no reality.

B1.1.3 Physical Reality is realized by unambiguous Observations

Already the philosophers of 17^th century like Rene Descartes were convinced that knowledge of the physical reality can exclusively be gained by following steps, which were called “scientific method”.

* Doing natural and experimental unambiguous observations.

* Define physical statements by unambiguous conclusions from unambiguous observations.

* Define general physical rules which are conform to all statements by observations.

* Define the most general physical rules, which are called fundamental laws of nature.

* By the fundamental laws of nature all interactions in universe can be described in detail and logically explained.

An already found fundamental law of nature is the principle of conservation of total energy.

A fundamental law of nature can also be expressed as a force. The principle of conservation of total energy can be expressed by the force that kinetic energy of an object stays stable as long as there is no force which causes a change of movement.

Major conclusions by observations were already achieved by Isaac Newton:

* Every change of the movement of an object with mass requires a force.

* Multiple forces can be added to a common force by vectorial addition.

Unfortunately he was not aware that forces must be physically possible, which means, that forces can only be exerted and experienced by contacts of objects, which are mostly collisions. Otherwise he would have concluded like many other physicists that there has to be an omnipresent matter in space, which causes invisible forces like the gravitational force.

B1.1.4 The strictly following of Scientific Method resulted to Weltformel

By strictly following the Scientific Method I have found in 2018 that the interactions in universe are ruled just by one additional fundamental law of nature besides the conservation of total energy. The second fundamental law refers to the force that particles in universe get minimal possible internal energy, which is achieved by binding (explained separately).

The two fundamental laws of nature can be mathematically expressed and combined to a common law which refers to the Weltformel, which has been predicted ans searched since beginning of physical research. The English expression “Theory of everything” could not be used as the Weltformel is the contrary: The reality of everything.

The Weltformel fulfill the basic requirement for the Weltformel: The capability to describe and explain all observations in universe by a common simple rule.

Since 2018 I worked full-time in order to describe and explain all relevant observations by the Weltformel. This showed to be more complicated than expected, mainly because my knowledge of physics strongly hindered the finding of reality. Till now I have described in detail and logically explained about 700 natural and experimental observations by the Weltformel, so that all relevant observations in universe are covered.

B1.1.5 Finding of SURe requires high IQ and no theoretical Knowledge

As already mentioned the realty of the universe can only be found by conclusions from unambiguous observations. Unfortunately formerly there were no adequate possibilities to do sufficient observations to conclude physical reality, so that fictive statements have been made, which were declared to be real physics.

Meanwhile physicists have done many additional observations, which are not conform to the former statements of physicists. When an observation is not conform to a statement, the statement is refuted and thus is wrong physics, which has to be eliminated from physics. Our brains, however, generally do not realize the refutation. Root cause for this is that because of determinism we have no free will, which means that we have no direct control over our brains. By nature our brains automatically choose the response action, by which an advantage can be expected. Real or unreal is no criteria for our brains. Our brains think, that it is an advantage to avoid possible conflicts and show others that you have high knowledge of physics. By this it decides to belief the same as former physicists.

This was 40 years also the case for my brain. Then I got aware that there are many crucial advantages to know the physical reality, which is concluded from observations. By repeated firm thinking that it is better for mankind and complete nature to do find the reality of the universe, I achieved to condition my brain to accept exclusively unambiguous conclusions from observations as real physics. The superseding of stored physical knowledge by physical reality was not easy and has to be continued even after 8 years.

Overall for the benefit of mankind and complete nature physicists have to condition their brains to physical reality. It can be strongly supported by the thinking, that formerly physicists had not the possibility to get aware of the physically reality, so that physical impossible theories had to be made up. But now physicists have the possibility to use the great experimental work of physicists to conclude the physical reality. In later chapters it is shown that it is extremely crucial to accept physical reality.

Overall this shows that following is required to detect and/or accept physical reality :

* A high score by IQ-tests. Comment: IQ tests are mainly based on observations, mostly presented as a sequence pictures and the unambiguous conclusion of the observations.

* The understanding, that most knowledge of physics is no reality, because of lack of former analytical capabilities.

* Always to rely on own intelligence and not on statements of other.

* Always use the own intelligence to draw conclusions from unambiguous observations.

* Become aware of the requirements of physical reality.

* Become aware of statements which are not physical reality

B1.1.6 Current Barriers to accept Reality after Realizing

Until now there have been in addition serious barriers to accept physical reality even, when a scientist realizes the error.

The replacement of theories by physical reality means, that there have been erroneous statements.

It Is the nature of a human brain, that it thinks, that it is better to conceal an error, when there is a low chance that others will detect the error. There are many examples, where scientist got in serious trouble because of reporting an error of current physics, which the scientist replaced by reality. Leading scientists fear that errors causes losses of reliability and reputations of scientists and fear reductions of public funding.

There are just very few examples where a physicist reported an erroneous statement and his measurements, which resulted to the reality. a new conclusion by new observations and admitted that a former statement is wrong and has to be replaced by the real conclusion. The last physicist, who reported an error which occurred by an insufficient observations, was Galileo Galilee. The authority of church needed a very long time to admit their error, but finally admitted that they have done an error. Since then physicists either did not realize any more clearly refuted physical statements or agreed on the taboo to admit an error or to uncover errors of other physicists.

Fact is that physicists have the intellect to do unambiguous conclusions based on the currently available unambiguous observations, but they don’t draw theses conclusions, which would refute their erroneous believed physical statements, which are still in physics books.

This caused that only about 10% of written text in physical compendiums like Wikipedia are physical reality.

By sophisticated experimental work, physical scientist could achieve to develop and construct a wealth of technical equipment, which is of great value for mankind. This is a particularly outstanding performance, as only little fundamental physical knowledge was available and nearly all developments had to be done by try and error.

All unambiguous descriptions of nature and technical devices are reality. The problem is that nearly all descriptions of observations are falsified, because our brains add automatically assumptions to the observations, when there are missing informations like physically possible forces. This phenomenon is called biased observation. Mostly we do not even realize, when the description of an observation is done by assumptions.

Beside this crucial problem concerning description, physicists had nearly no chance to do a scientific explanation of the observed interactions. For this it is required to have knowledge of the corresponding forces or fundamental laws of nature. Already Isaac Newton has found out by observations, that all changes of movements require a force. Therefore the knowledge of the only force which causes changes of movements is required to do physically real descriptions and explanations

It can be assumed that maximal 10% of documented physics is physical reality.

B1.1.7 List of Examples of physically impossible Phenomenons

By the logic requirement that physical reality has to be physical, following magic issues, which have no 3-dimensional structures, are no reality, which means do not exist and have been deleted from physics:

- Electromagnetic waves.

- Gravitational waves.

- Charges and the corresponding properties of particles like charged, polar and ionic

- All forces and interactions in universe which are not caused by collisions or contacts of objects/particles. By this the four currently claimed basic forces are no reality.

- All energies, which do not refer to motions of objects.

- All fictive particles, which have no describable structure and thus can’t be observed like all quarks, w-and z- bosons, Higgs-particle, gluon, tauon.

Physical Impossibilities by Violations of Laws of Nature:

* Violation of constancy of total energy by

- Tunneling effect

- Spontaneous reactions

* Violation of principle of relativity

- All statements of relative theories

* Other:

- Symmetry violations

-All physical impossible theories and statements like

- theory of big bang.

-theories of relativity.

-theories of quantum physics.

- Many invalid formulas, constants and units.

Most crucial is that there are physical impossible descriptions and no scientific explanation of fundamental quantities in physics like

- Matter

- All energies including heat and other thermodynamic quantities

- Force including pressure

- Mass

B1.1.8 Nearly everybody has the Intelligence for realizing Reality

In order to get knowledge about physical reality, it is required to draw unambiguous conclusions from unambiguous observations.

This is the same process which is used for IQ-tests: Observing a sequence of situations and conclude from this the next picture.

I am sure that most scientists have a higher IQ-score than me. The difference is just, that I have consequently conditioned my brain to check all physical statements, whether these are physically possible and to use only statements for conlusions of physical reality, which are physically possible. For interactions the major criteria is, that everything which mankind is not able to do, can also not be done by matter. Unambiguously reality is that human beings can not exert forces to another body without touching the other body. By this I could clearly exclude that the currently stated forces are physical reality. The unambiguous conclusion is that there is omnipresent matter and that the omnipresent matter has to be very stable and small, whoch os known only by photons.

In addition it was clear that forces by collisions can only occur by differences of densities of colliding photons. See chapter P6.1. (Derivation of gravitational force.) Most difficult was to condition my brain to the fact that physical possibility is a much superior criteria to be reality than following critera:

* All scientists on earth believe the statement.

* Having learned the statement in school or on university.

Iy a later chapter it will be shown, that all matter, all energies , all forces can be unambiguously concuded from the only physically possible mecachnism, that the matter and energy of universe was created out of nothing.

B1.1.9 Physicists could have detected SURe many Decades earlier

Just two issues would have been required to be fulfilled, so that physicists would have detected the physical reality multiple decades earlier:

* The conditioning of people to the fact, that errors are normality, particular by research work and is no sign of poor intelligence.

* Physicists should have got the major task to test all statements periodically whether being conform to observations and should be honored and highly acknowledged and appreciated by detection and elimination of a nonconformity.

Physicist are surely capable to detect physical reality few month after getting this task.

If physical research institutions would announce today that every scientific refutation will be acknowledged as excellent research performance, physical scientist would convert current physics within less than two years to physical reality.

B1.1.10 Nature of Mankind is not suitable for Detection of Reality

In nature it is often observed that there are dominant leaders of a group and many followers. Also scientist want to be recognized to be dominant experts by their competence to explain observations about their area of expertise. By the thinking that people expect a quick statement, physicists nearly always do statements without to consider carefully whether the statement is physical possible and conform to all observations. When scientists later get aware that a statement was done erroneously and is clearly physical impossible, scientists follow the nature of mankind, which is to conceal that the statement was done erroneously, particular when meanwhile the statement has been generally accepted. By admitting own errors scientists fear to loose their high dominance as experts with high scientific skills.

This source of physical impossible physics is supported by following facts:

* People generally blindly believe in everything, which is claimed by a well recognized person or an educated expert in the corresponding scientific area.

* Physicists simply had not the time to wait for publishing until the physical reality of observations was found. Quick publications were required in order that research facilities ensured public funding.

* Most current physically impossible statements occurred by conclusions from already done erroneous statements.

* In former years there were often too less experimental observations to conclude the physical reality of a physical phenomenon.

B1.1.11 By luck I fulfilled all Requirements to detect physical Reality

Following facts supported or were required to detect the Weltformel

* Having time to do scientific research for over 20 years without pressure to present any results.

* I had not to fear loss of reputation by admitting own errors. Overall about 90% of my work was searching and refutations of own errors, and the subsequent revisions of own theories.

* My clear learning was, that before achieving a final real statement for an interactions, it is normality that on average 4 revisions of former own statements have to be done, because of finding own errors.

Comment: The occurrence of errors in scientific research is normal. When no errors are reported in a research group this is a clear indication that errors are not admitted and that many claimed statements are no reality.

* No frustration although I did 90% of my work for the “wastebasket”.

* I had extensive experiences and knowledge in instrumental analytic and reaction kinetics.

Comment: Three of the 5 five only fundamental interactions in universe refer to reaction kinetics: collisions followed by building or breaking of bondings.

* No need to be supported and no financial interests.

* Completely independent work possibilities.

* No need for own experiments, as the available experiments of physicists were sufficient.

* Thus all my statements are based on the great research work of physicists since beginning of physical research.

The conclusion is: I would need many pages to list all physicists who contributed to the finding of SURe- New Physics.

The detection of the reality of the universe is the achievement of all physical scientists, who did experimental or natural observations.

B1.1.12 The Detection of the only two Fundamental Laws of Nature

In 2017 I already SURe - New Physics has achieved already in 2018 to detect the only two fundamental laws of nature. This was possible by based on unambiguous conclusions of observations.

This was possible, because physical scientists did sufficient natural and experimental observations. The major work was to check all documented physical research for added thinking and thoroughly eliminate all statements, which referred not to unambiguous observations. Thus exclusively from the remaining rest of about 10% SURe – New Physics was derived.

First this resulted to generally valid physical rules. From these the most general physical laws have been derived, which resulted to the fact, that there are only two most general physical laws, which explain all other physical laws. These laws are called fundamental laws of nature.

One fundamental law of nature is well known in current physics, but often violated, which is the fundamental law of conservation of total energy. This fundamental law results to the force that the relative kinetic energy of an object is forced to stay constant as long as there is no other force.

The second fundamental law of nature refers to the fundamental force of objects to minimize their internal energies. This is explained in detail later.

The two only fundamental laws of nature are at the same time the only forces in universe. Based on unambiguous observations it is known that forces can exclusively be exerted and experienced by contacts of objects. The contacts are generally collisions.

All interaction in universe refer to changes of motions of objects by collisions. It is well known since Isaac Newton that every change of motion requires a force.

This means that all interactions in universe have to be and can be explained by the two forces which always add to a common force by vector addition.

By SURe – New Physics all interaction in universe can be scientifically (=logically) explained and be in detail described.

This means by SURe – New-Physics it is the first time possible to understand the universe.

After my retirement as physic-chemist with focus on reaction kinetics, I investigated since 2015 all relevant interactions (about 700) in all areas of physics in order to describe and explain these by the two fundamental laws of nature and replaced all theories by physical reality. By this all questions about why- and how the interactions occur could unambiguously be answered. This means nearly all causes and effect of all physical events are documented. Some specific interactions still have to be added.

B1.1.13 The Detection of the Weltformel

The two fundamental laws of nature can be mathematically expressed. The combination of the two fundamental laws is the long-sought “Weltformel”. The English term “Theory of Everything” could not be used as it is the contrary of the German term “Weltformel”, which is the reality of everything. This Weltformel is the only valid Weltformel and fulfills the requirements of a Weltformel, which is that it describes in detail all interactions and states in universe and logically explain these by physically possible, mechanical forces.

But by the two findings above it would have been already possible to conclude the only possibility how matter and energy was generated out of nothing.

By finding this possibility all other knowledge about physically possible interactions can be concluded and by this the fundamental force which causes all changes of movements in universe. Actually all interactions in universe refer to changes of movements.

Thus one single force determines all interactions in universe.

Scientists know that when the generation of matter and energy is possible, then the reverse reaction is also physically possible.

It sounds strange, but it is physically reality: the only existing force is that matter and energy intends to achieve it’s ground state, which is nothing.

We are very lucky that this is generally only partly possible, which results to the only physically possible bindings.

B1.2 Determinism is physical Reality

B1.2.1 Definition of Determinism

Complete determinism means that the momentary properties of interacting objects determine the interaction and the properties of interacting objects after the interactions.

Properties of objects are, the relative kinetic energies, vibration energies, temperature, the relative spin orientations, the structures and the relative positions of structures.

B1.2.2 Determinism is an unambiguous conclusion from Observations

Complete determinism of interactions in universe can be unambiguously concluded by following observations:

* In all regions of space basically the same celestial bodies including the ordered appearance (galaxies) have been developed out of first generated particles in universe.

* The development of living beings occur by a small piece of matter.

* Generally valid physical rules (laws of nature) have been found.

* All snowflakes are bound in the basically the same shape, which means planar hexagons structures.

* Magnetic structures can be made visible by bindings to iron files. Magnetic field line are This shows that magnetic field. Magnetic field lines can be generated everywhere, which means by omnipresent photons. By this omnipresent photons always bind to a linear direction.

Overall not all sequences of interactions in universe occur more than billion times billion times the same way, which unambiguously prove that all interaction in universe are predetermined. Not any interaction occurs by accident.

B1.2.3 Determinism correspond to highest possible Simplicity

Determinism means that the possibilities for interactions have to be so strong rectricted, so that there is just one concrete possibility for every new interaction of two particles. Thus a new bonding has to be done at a specific position. In current physics the forces which result to bindings have been claimed to be multiple possibilities like charges and electron-pairs. Charges do physically not exist charges or strongly restricted and it is physical impossible that two electrons cause the binding of two atomic nuclei.

But besides binding, there occurs also breaking of bondings which result often to the ejection of particles like photons. For this there is not even a theory for a force which is required besides an energy.

The requirements for building and breaking of bondings:

* There have to be physically possible forces which occur by contacts of particles.

* Their have to be specific positions in the structure of particles so that binding occurs.

* The binding force between some specific particles has to be very strong and between other specific particles particles very weak..

* The binding force can be reduced by another specific interaction, so that the bonding breaks.

* There has to be a force which causes ejection of bound particle.

* There has to be a reason why one interaction occurs before another interaction.

In current physics there are not any valid explanations for any interaction

* acceleration of force for bonding Binding force Explain the specific predetermined positions of bondings.

* Explain why positions of are are: that atomic nuclei have very specific positions in their structures which are suitable for doing bindings binding force can bind twelectron-pairs t is free moving echarges In fact This is fulfilled by the finding of is only possible, when the possibilities for interactions are reduced to one gle as well as the Weltformel correspond to the fact, that the universe has been created with the highest possible simplicity.

In former times also many scientists were convinced that the universe has to be based on a high degree of simplicity.

The reality of only one existing elementary particle (electron) shows that there are many possibilities how one type of particle binds to other particles. For example physicists have found about 3400 different atomic nuclei. Mathematicians can show, that the universe would be chaotic, if there would be two or more elementary particle, which do mutual interactions. There would be no definite matter anymore and no common rule for interactions.

By SURe – New-Physics the detailed bonding-structures of most particles have been determined. Besides subatomic and atomic particles this include also matter of stars, black holes and the structures of the different force fields.

Only by knowledge of the detailed structures the interactions of objects can be described and explained.

B1.2.4 Determination requires requires exactly two Forces

If there would be more than two forces this would allow too many interactions But as there are two contrary interactions there have to be at least two forces: One force, which causes the building of a bonding and one force, which cause the breaking of a bonding. If there would be just one force, the universe would not exist anymore, because it ended up either as a big complex of bound particles or it ends up as a huge number of non-interacting elementary particles.

Forces are results of fundamental laws of nature. So there are exactly two fundamental laws of nature.

As already mentioned, one fundamental law of nature has already been found, which is the fundamental law of continuous constancy of total energy, which is known as principle of conservation of total energy. This fundamental law can be expressed by the force that kinetic energy of an object stays stable as long as there is no force which causes a change of movement.

This force causes the breaking of bondings by collisions and the corresponding kinetic energy.

The second and missing force, is the force which causes all changes of movements. This decelerates the kinetic energies of particles so that these bind.

But it causes in addition the acceleration of bound particles, so that these vibrate until the bonding breaks and the broken parts are catapulted to opposite sides.

The currently missing force is called fundamental force, as it is the only active force which determines all interactions in universe. All observations in universe refer to interactions of objects, by which movements are changed. Constant movement is no interaction but a state of an object.

B1.2.5 How the currently unknown Force could be found

I achieved the detection of the only fundamental force in universe by the finding of the physical possible mechanism, how matter and energy has been generated out of nothing by physically possible forces.

As there is exclusively one possibility for this. The found mechanism is physical reality, which means that no observations are required, But of course the detected force is conform to all observations and thus can’t be refuted.

The detected second force is at the same time the second fundamental law of nature. There is no other fundamental law of nature.

In addition by the solution of how the matter and energy was generated out of nothing it can be concluded following important realities:

* The scientific definition of matter.

* The scientific definition of internal energy.

* The scientific explanations of bondings and vibrations of particles .

* The scientific explanation of bindings (=absorption) and breaking of bondings (inkl. emission) of particles-

Everything is presented in chapter B2.

Actually the mechanism of the generation of matter and energy can be concluded by the findings of Isaac Newton concerning motions and forces.

Most physicists have already drawn the correct conclusion that matter has to be generated by pairs of matter and antimatter particles.

Before reading the solution in chapter 2 everyone can think about the solution as brain teaser.

B1.2.6 A Computer can calculate the Development of the Universe

The Weltformel can be programmed, so that it is possible that a computer can calculate the basic states of the universe from beginning to future.

Until now the powers of computers are much too low to do the detailed calculation, but simplifications can be done to reduce the required power to a minimum so that this is possible in the near future. No problem are the calculations of the bonding - structures of nearly all particles including force fields, stars and black hole, which would verify the derived structures by SURe – New Physics.

A computer with a sophisticated AI-program can even be asked to create something out of nothing by mechanical physical rules, which will result to our universe.

B1.2.7 Summary of Conclusions by Determinism

The conclusions, which can be drawn from determinism are:

* The complete development of the universe from the first objects to the momentary and future states of objects in universe is predetermined.

* There has to be a physically possible mechanism, by which all matter and energy was generated out of nothing.

* By the knowledge of first matter and energy it should be possible to conclude all physically possible interactions in universe, and in addition the physically possible forces and the fundamental laws of nature, by which all interactions in universe occur.

* Physical reality is unique and thus can be clearly described.

* All theories are obsolete and all discussions about theories and reality can be dropped.

* Most important conclusion of determinism is that we have no free will, which means that we have no direct control of our brains. Later it is explained why this is the major factor for the late detection of the physical reality.

B1.3 Basic knowledge about Matter

B1.3.1 Significance and Conclusions from Observations

Physics is the natural science which describes and explains the interactions of matter. Therefore the fundamental and essential knowledge for physics is the concrete description and logical explanation of matter. Unfortunately this has been not achieved in current physics.

Basic unambiguous observations are:

1. Atomic matter exerts an opposite pressure (=force) against the experienced pressure by another object.

The unambiguous conclusion is:

Atomic matter consists of atoms bound to molecules with specific structures, which occupy 3-dimensional volume and by this exert a resistance against other atomic matter.

2a. The ratios of diameters between an atomic nucleus and the corresponding atom is between 20,000 – 100,000.

2b. Electrons have a much smaller volume than atomic nuclei.

2c. Moving electrons, which do various orbit movements around an atomic nucleus are physical impossible, because of lack of corresponding forces.

2d. Complete mass of an atom refers just to the nucleus.

Conclusions:

- Nearly 100% of matter in an atom is not known.

- Nearly 100% of matter in an atom has no mass.

- Current statement that matter has always a mass is no reality.

In chemistry it has been unambiguously observed

3a. Particles are not generated by magics, which means by a fictitious, physically impossible force (weak force), but by physical interactions, which are building and breaking of bondings after activation of theses reactions by collisions:

a) Larger particles are generated by building of bondings between particles.

b) Smaller particles are generated by breaking of bondings between particles.

3b. Rates of reaction depend on product of concentrations of reacting types of particles and on temperature.

3c. By increasing temperature the reaction rates are generally faster.

3d. By increasing temperature breaking of bondings are generally preferred.

3e. Every reaction requires an activation energy which is provided by collisions of particles, which explains the generally faster reaction rates by increasing temperature.

Conclusions

- All interactions, by which new particles are generated refer to building or breaking of bondings.

- In all aggregation states particles of matter do collisions.

4a. By unambiguous observations physicists found out already in the 1930s years that protons and neutrons and thus all atomic matter decay to electrons and positrons as smallest observed particles. (see next chapter)

4b. It is observed that by identical magnetic fields the claimed electrons and positrons are deflected to the same direction, when these enter the magnetic field by same directions.

Conclusions:

4a. There is only one type of elementary particle in universe which is the electron and its antimatter particle.

4b. Matter particles and the corresponding antimatter particles are identical particles, which verifies that charges do not exist.

Max Planck did many studies, about emissions of photons by atomic matter which showed following:

5a. Every type of atomic matter emits continuously photons.

5b. The kinetic energies and intensities of emitted photons are increased by increasing temperature.

Conclusions:

5a. Every atom consists nearly completely out of mutually bound photons, which refer to the missing matter of an atom.

5b. As atoms are bound to molecules, between two atomic nuclei there have to be long chain-structures of bound photons. This is the only physically possible bonding between atoms.

5c. As the emissions of photons occur continuously, there have to exist omnipresent photons, which do new bindings and thus replace the emitted photons.

5d. As kinetic energies of emitted photons increase by increasing temperature, the breaking of bound photons require a relative high collision energy.

5e. The first generated molecule in universe is hydrogen, which refers to two protons which are bound by a long photon-chain structure.

5f. All atoms are nuclei on which a specific number of photon-chains (nearly always < 5) are bound in the same plane.

5g. Molecules are generated by binding of photon-chains. All atoms of a molecule are in a plane.

5h. By generation of matter in universe first electrons were generated which quickly bound to photons.

5i. As photons are by far the most stable particles, these exists as omnipresent photons, which refer to nearly 100% of all particles in universe.

6. Observation: In and over seemingly empty space attractive and repulsive forces are exerted and experienced.

Conclusions

6a. Most observations of interactions, which apparently occur without collisions, refer to collisions of omnipresent photons to atomic matter.

6b. Some observations refer to interaction of cosmic protons, photons or electron-pairs (=neutrinos) to atomic matter.

B1.3.2 In the 1930s years physics was nearest to physical Reality

The first and last essential knowledge of matter was gained by physicists in 1930s years by studies of air showers. Physicists had the brilliant idea to study the successive decay steps of cosmic protons, which occur be collisions of the protons to molecules in atmosphere. This was achieved by analyzing and identification of the particles in different altitudes of atmosphere. See .Air shower (physics) - Wikipedia .

Chemists know that decay reactions occur step-wise as just one bonding gets broken at the same time. By each decay step just two broken parts as new generated particle are generated. The generated particles often do subsequent collisions by which a bonding of each of both newly generated particle is broken and again two new particles are generated. Thus finally there is an avalanche of generated particle. This avalanche of subatomic particles in atmosphere is called “air shower”.

At least chemists also know, that, when reactions occur by breaking of bondings, also the reverse reactions by building of bondings occur.

Overall by the unambiguous results of this experiment I could conclude the generation of complete matter in universe until all celestial bodies including black holes and of course dark matter. In addition I could conclude all detailed bonding structures of particles

By the unambiguous finding of this experiment, that the only elementary particles are electrons and positrons, I could conclude following:

* How electrons and positrons were generated out of nothing.

* The only existing five interactions in universe.

* The logical explanations of all interactions by the only active force.

The explanations are presented in separate chapters.

Unfortunately the brains of physicists were manipulated by stored physical impossible knowledge of physics, so these didn’t realize the unambiguous conclusions by unambiguous observations.

By this it was the last chance of physicists to detect the physical reality of the universe. As there was no chance any more for physicists that any interaction in universe could be explained, physics officially converted to antiscience, by the statement that physical reality does not exist, that determinism does not exist and that the reality in universe occurs when it is not observed.

The conversion of physics to antiscience was manifested by a new are of physics called quantum mechanics, which is the contrary of observed mechanics, which means a paradox term.

B1.3.3 The finding of the only elementary Particles: Electrons and Positrons

By the studues of air showers following decay steps have been found :

neutron → proton → kaon → pion → muon → electron-neutrino → electron + positron

The separate decay steps are conform to later identifications of decay particles by physicists.

The generally accepted definition of an elementary particle is, that an elementary particle is the smallest particle, which cannot be split to smaller particles. But the conclusion, that electron ano positron are the only elementary particles was not drawn by physicists.

In the avalanche of subatomic particles also many photons are observed. These are mainly generate by the decay of photon chains from molecules of atmosphere by the collisions of cosmic protons. When photon chains decays 5 photons of a photon ring are nearly generated at the same time by each collision.

By this the scientists, who performed these experimental studies, have achieved by far the most important findings in history of natural science.

B1.3.4 Why did Physicists do no Conclusions from these findings?

There are two reasons, which refer to the natural characterstics of our brains:

1. When observations are not conform to already stored formation in our brain, then the brain does generally not use the new information for conclusions. This fact is called “manipulation” by stored information, which is valued by brain as higher reliability. He already stored statement is: Particles are generated by magic conversions to different particles like it was claimed by Alchemy.

2. When an own error is later discovered by oneself, our brains naturally do not admit to other people, that they have done an error. This is done by the brain, when it expects that there might be disadvantages by admitting the error.

Many physicists have experienced, that physicists get in a lot of trouble instead of being acknowledged by reporting the observed reality, when the error is already accepted to be physics. (Examples are shown in a separate chapter.)

Only by repeated self- training people can achieve that their brains act differently to the natural behavior.

I had luck that I concluded the reality already in 2017, as in the later input in German Wikipedia the important information that the first generated decay- particles in higher atmosphere are the different kaons, had been deleted. The knowledge that the first decay particles are two kaons was essential for my conclusions, because without the starting step of decays an unambiguous conclusion would have been not possible.

B1.3.5 The observed Reactions of cosmic Protons

By the knowledge of the structures of atomic nuclei and protons exclusively following reactions are possible:

1. By collision of a cosmic proton to an nucleus of a nitrogen molecule first the proton binds to the nucleus, by which a photon-chain is emitted. Than the proton decays to a pion, which is bound to the nucleus and a kaon which is emitted:

1. Proton (13e) → kaon (10e) + pion (3e)

2. The kaon can do different decays,

a) either to two isomeric pions

kaon (10e) → pion (5e) + iso- pion (5e)

b) or to kaon-S and an electron-pair = electron-neutrino:

kaon (10e) → kaon-S (8e) + electron-pair (2e)

3. The kaon-S decays to a kaon-L

kaon-S (8e) → kaon-L (6e) + electron-pair(2e)

4. The kaon-L decays to all kind of particles:

a) kaon-L (6e) → pion (5e) + electron

b) kaon-L (6e) → iso-photon (4e) + electron-pair(2e)

c) kaon-L (6e) → muon (3e) + muon (3e)

4. The pion reacts to a mon and an electron-pair:

a) pion (5e) → muon (3e) + electron-pair(2e)

5. The iso- pion reacts to a photon and am electron

b) iso-pion (5e) → photon (4e) + electron (e)

6. The muon reacts to an electron-pair and an electron

muon (3e) → electron-pair(2e) + electron (e)

Generation of neutrons:

Neutrons can be generated by decay of cosmic deuterons:

deuteron (23 e) → proton (13e) + neutron (10e)

B1.3.6 Error and Reality of the Decay of a Neutron

A neutron does not decay but the neutron-decay is a result of the binding of a high-energetic gamma- photon to a neutron with subsequent emission of an electron:

Neutron (10e) + photon (4e) → proton (13e) + electron (e)

The natural decay of a neutron occurs by collisions of gamma photons with a specific kinetic energy from sun. This occurs also at night time. This verfies that gamma-photons have such a high kinetic energy that these penetrate through the earth without losses of kinetic energy.

As the intensities of gamma-rays from sun are only nearly stable, but vary with intensities of generated radiation from sun, the decay rates of neutrons are not stable.

It has already been shown by measurements over several years that the decay rate increases in January each year, when the earth receives higher intensities of radiated photons by sun because it is nearer to sun.

This is an ambiguous refutation of the theory that radioactive decays occur spontaneously.

Typically for the character of mankind is that we don’t want to admit, when we have made an error. Particular physicists think, that the detection of an error is a desaster. This is understandable, because by detection of an error it might be detected that nearly all statements in physics are no reality because of errors.

Therefore it was organized to repeat the yearly measurements. “Accidently” for the repeated measurements an equipment was used which had not the required accuracy to measure the observed yearly variation. By this physicists achieved a fake refutation of the real measurement data.

The unambiguous reality is that both radioactive beta-decays refer to two different reactions of atomic nuclei with gamma-photons from sun.

Increasing half-times correlate with increasing kinetic energies of gamma-photons from sun as the intensities reduce by increasing kinetic energies.

Comment: Not known but unambiguous reality is that high energetic – gamma-rays have a zero potential to be hazardous for mankind, contrary to radio radiation!

On order to complete:

The reaction of the decay of an alpha-particle (nucleus of He4) refers to the spli of two protons:

Alpha- particle (26e) → proton (13e) + proton (13e)

The decay to two protons is well observed in cloud chambers.

There are no other relevant subatomic particles than listed in the last chapters..

B1.3.7 In 1964 Physics converted to Antiscience

In 1964, about 30 years after the historic findings of the decay of protons, the unambiguously observed reality was replaced by physically impossible science-fiction: The theories that protons consists of quarks and gluons and that these are elementary particles.

The theory of quarks was made up although there was not any indication that there are other elementary particles in known matter than electrons.

Even when there would be two different sizes if electrons, there would be so many combinations of bound electrons, that the universe would be chaotic which means without physical rules.

B1.3.8 The claimed verification of non-existing Quarks

Not any physicists would dare to claim that the existence of quarks have been verified, but the bad thing is that scientists did not correct the statements in media and magazines, which state that quarks have been verified by deep-elastic scattering experiments which are done by high energetic collisions of electrons to frozen hydrogen molecules. Correct is that physicists did this experiments, but just claimed that they have not found an indication that a proton contains a single body. Of course every scientists know that this is extremely far away from a valid verification. When something is not observed which is assumed that it should by observed, than the observation is just a refutation of a fictive assumption. They should have reported the truth about the observed results which are following: The emitted electrons to the sample showed deflections to many different directions all over the shape of the proton. By this the deflections either occur by a single particle which has many fluctuations in the consistence of its mass, or many nearly identical particles. Both possibilities refute the theory of 3 quarks!

In addition it is non-sense to talk about something that is expected to be within a proton. A proton is no container!

The physical realities are:

* A proton is a centrally symmetrical structure of 13 bound electrons.

* All bondings in universe refer to partly superposed electrons without space between bound electrons, so that a proton is one single mass like every particle, but the energetic density of the mass is various because of the 13 bound electrons.

The detailed reality is following : The electrons which are radiated to the proton penetrate through the proton. During the penetration these experiences forces by the 13 rotating electrons of a proton. Although all 13 electrons do identical spin rotations and although there is one single “mass” of bound electrons, these cause deflections of varios directions, because the direction and quantity of deflection depends on the accurate position of penetration, because the sum of rotations are very different within short areas.

Overall the observations of the experiment are conform to SURe- New Physics but not conform to theory of quarks.

But physicist did not refute the theory, but did that which they always do in such cases they add to a refuted theory another physically impossible and unexplainable theory: In this case they claimed, that there are many other particles in a proton, so that the quarks are not seen as single particles. The other particles are an undefined number of gluons and an undefined number of “sea-quarks”.

B1.4 The most catastrophic Failure of Brains to recognize Reality

B1.4.1 The fatal Error about the Cause for Climate Warming

This is an unbelievable example, which shows how strong our brains believe in statements, when in all media it is reported, that these cause catastrophic situations for all human beings. By this all former unambiguous knowledge about climate which was even learned in schools is not recognized any more by our brains.

Another incredible example is that in a scientific TV- report called Terra X an atmosphere- physicist demonstrates by a specific camera that CO2 eliminates radiated heat (IR-photons) and concludes that the observed elimination of heat is caused by absorption of IR- molecules. This is physical reality.

But as this is shown in a report of “climate catastrophe”, everyone thinks that CO2 causes by absorption of heat climate warming. It is not realized that the experiment proves that absorption by CO2 clearly causes cooling of climate.

This experiment impressively shows, how easy our brains can be manipulated to realize the contrary what is clearly observed.

B1.4.2 Even my Brain was successfully manipulated for over 40 years

For over 40 years I was convinced in the daily warning that the climate warming threatens our life and that it is caused by the high absorption potential of the increasing CO2 in atmosphere. I automatically felt obliged to do actions against further CO2 increase. I even published an E-book against increase of CO2.

In order to verify the value of my efforts I checked all availble knowledge. Particular I recalled my own knowledge about CO2 based on my experiences as lab manager concerning absorption of IR-photons (=heat) and my knowledge by my expertise on reaction kinetics.

It was like a shock for me to realize that my knowledge and my experience was contrary to my belief. I more and more got aware about the unambiguous realities, which I experienced by my own analytical work:

* Absorption of CO2 in atmosphere causes that heat is eliminated because IR-photons are bind to atomic molecules like CO2.

*Absorption (=binding) of a particle means that the particle and its characteristic does not exist any more.

Overall absorption of IR-photons is equivalent to elimination of heat and elimination of heat means cooling.

* IR- absorption peaks clearly go to less intensities of heat.

* Increase of heat can only occur by emissions of IR-photons, which have a higher energy (=heat) than the heat of omnipresent photons.

* Spectroscopic measurement of CO2 show also no emission peaks of IR-photons (=heat) by CO2, which proves that there is no reflection or scattering of heat.

* In school I have learned that the atmosphere of earth causes cooling, which depends on travel distance of IR-photons through atmosphere. Thus my school-knowledge is conform with my later experience but not to the greenhouse theory.

Overall I have found more than 50 unambiguous refutations of the theory that CO2 and other “greenhouse gases” cause climate warming. One refutation would already require to eliminate the theory of greenhouse effect. There is the same number of proofs for the logical reality, that CO2 and other gases in atmosphere cause cooling of climate by absorption of heat.

I have checked many performed experiments, which are claimed to verify the greenhouse theory. All could be clearly identified to be fake verification, which are based on errors.

Nearly all interaction concerning climate and thermodynamics are currently either not or errorneously explained. See SURe- . New Physics Vol. C (Climate change) and SURe- New Physics Vol. T (Thermodynamics).

B1.4.3 Physicists got aware that Absorption means Elimination

In the latest explanation of the greenhouse theory physicist don’t use anymore the scientific expression “absorption of IR-photons “, but the rather unscientific expressions “absorption by trapping of heat” or just “trapping of heat”. In between “blocking” was used and illustrations still show reflection of emitted photons from earth surface. This clearly shows, that physicists have no idea to explain the greenhouse theory. They had to create a new type of absorption to make clear that the heat is not eliminated but still exists. How CO2 molecules can trap heat and why absorption of IR-photons occurs differently than all other photons is not explained. It is also rather unscientific to use the term heat, which is nothing physical and thus cannot be bound, rejected, blocked or trapped.

Besides the missing explanation of the greenhouse-theory, there is no valid explanation for thermodynamic quantities like heat and radiation of heat.

B1.4.4 Explanation of Climate requires Explanation of Heat

The physical reality and scientific definition of heat is the average kinetic energy of omnipresent low energetic IR-photons in a macroscopic volume (explained in other chapters).

Radiation of heat or correct radiating IR- photons are no heat, but can generate heat by thermal absorption (bindings to photon-chains of atoms), but not by absorption which refers to bindings to atomic nuclei, which is the usual, measured absorption of gas molecules like CO2.

B1.4.5 Physicist try to prevent, that the Climate-Error is detected

It is very likely that physicist got aware that the greenhouse theory is based on a fatal error. Only by this it can be explained why physicist have started with the next action, which our brains do, when an own severe error is detected: Everything is done, so that the error is not detected by common public. Therefore they eliminate more and more findings from physics books, which clearly refute their theory. One example is the unambiguously proven cooling effect of atmosphere by absorption of heat. Instead of the strongly dominant effect of of increaded cooling by longer propagation path through atmosphere, now physicist claimed that the increased cooling is caused by the the incident angle, by which the intensity of radiation per area reduce.

This deception seems to be successful although everyone experience the significant cause quasi daily: The angle effect can be easily completely suppressed by facing one’s face to the sun at various times. Our skin is accurate enough to measure heat, but of course there are also possibilities by thermometers to demonstrate that the effect of incident angle can be nearly neglected compared to absorption of atmosphere.

Another refutation of the relevance of the area effect is that in polar summer the effect of longer heating is much stronger than the cooling effect of reduced intensities per area. It can be unambiguously calculated, that without the cooling effect of absorption , the temperatures on poles in polar summer would be much higher than on equator. Thus physicists have to explain now, why this is clearly not the case.

Thus physicist dare to falsify their own unambiguous findings of physical reality just in order to avoid to admit an error. This shows that they know, that their error has caused an enormous negative impact on mankind and nature.

The unambiguous reality is, that without the men-made increase of CO2 by 50% the global warming would be much stronger and quicker, so that living beings would have fatal problems to adjust to the climate warming, which is mainly a natural climate effect.

B1.4.6 Physicists falsified the measured Temperatures of Atmosphere

Another incredible example for falsification of clearly found physical reality in order to prevent that people get aware of the climate cooling effect by the increase of CO2 refers to the temperatures in atmosphere.

Unambiguously measurable and explainable by laws of physics is, that the temperatures in atmosphere continuously decrease by increasing distance from earth surface. This means temperatures reduce from about +15 °C to about – 270 °C in space.

It has to be mentioned, that it is positive, that physicists did not explain the non- existing higher temperatures by the greenhouse theory. Probably this would have been too suspicious, as nearly all physicists are well aware, that the high temperatures are not real. If asked no physicist would claim that the high temperatures are reality.

Some say that the high temperatures are not realized because of the extremely thin air in upper atmosphere. This is an example how unreal theories cause many other unreal theories. The reality is that temperatures in atmosphere are completely independent from density of air. Another wrong theory is that temperature depends of pressure, which means that high pressure causes high temperatures. Both statement can be easily refuted by usual measuements of temperature by contact thermometers. For this you can compare the temperatures between air or an other gas in a high pressure bottle and in a low pressure bottle. Both have the same temperature, which is the temperature of the surrounding. When you measure the two pressure bottles on moon. Both have the same temperature as the measured temperature of the surrounded vacuum on moon.

This unambiguously verifies that heat refers to average kinetic energies of omnipresent photons.

Thus temperatures can be measured everywhere and all measured values are real, which can be tested for example by freezing points of gases.

B1.4.7 The Antiscience of Heat Generation in upper Atmosphere

Physicists have found out that ozone is generated in upper atmosphere and claim that the higher temperatures are caused by ozone generation.

The reality is that the fluctuating generation and decay of ozone-molecules are reactions with photons, but not with IR-photons:

* The Generation of ozon starts with the decay of O2 molecules, which requires the collision of UV- photons to O2, by which O2 is split to two atoms and the UV- photon binds to one atom. Such a reaction, where a photon split a bonding of a molecule is called photolysis.

* Then the generated O-atom with the bound photon collides to an O2- molecule by which the atom is bound to the O2 so that ozone (O3) is generated..

- By this the bound photon is split off and emitted. The photon has less energy than before: It is a visible photon, with a kinetic energy which refers to the color blue.

- This reaction is the scientific and only explanation of the color of the sky. Current explanation by scattering is physically impossible.

- Scattering is done by collisions of visible photons from sun to aerosols in lower atmosphere, by which less energetic visible photons are generated, mainly red photons. This is the explanation that the sun appears yellow from earth which turns to red by sunrise or sunset, while the usual white color is seen without scattering from space or moon.

*The color of stars changes just by distance, as there are various intergalactic clouds of molecules and aerosols. All stars have the same white color with a surface temperature of below 14 K. Otherwise stars would not exist.

occurred because by nature of our brain the information, which is of higher value for our life, is favored to be accepted as reality. being it has more value to realize claimed hazards than observed normality that at noon more heat is received on earth surface than in the morning or evening. Later I will show, that the daily “climate changes” have exactly the same natural cause as the long term changes: the constantly emitted IR-photons by sun are absorbed by different numbers of molecules on their way to earth. It was just luck that mankind did a lot of burning, so that the global warming was mitigated. hlobal than variations of propagation oth “climate we will by the claimed hazards of the CO2 greenhouse theory, although this theory was refuted by unambiguous observations and by this was per definition antiscience. After our brains did not realize the learned school stuff anymore it was also eliminated from school books and physic books, so that there was nearly no chance for younger people than me to gain knowledge of the reality of climate warming.

The former knowledge was clearly reality, which can be demonstrated by the fact that it logically explains the causes for the differences of climate between earth and moon.

Extremely unscientific is that scientists use the average temperature of daytime (130 °C) and nighttime (minus 160 °C) to prove that the earth atmosphere has a warming effect of about 30 °C, which is used to claim that gases in atmosphere have a strong warming potential.

This shows a very typically automated function of our brains: These pick out from many received information exactly the information, which fits to our opinion, even when the information is completely irrelevant and unscientific. All other information, which do not fit to our opinion, are not realized by our brains and therefore are ignored.

Of course the average temperature of climate is completely irrelevant for all living beings. Crucial requirement for nature is that as well the day temperatures as also the night temperatures are in a range which is suitable for living.

I still learned in school the reality of the different climate effects of night and day, which cause an agreeable climate for living beings on day and at night.

* Daytime effects:

Cooling of earth surface by over 100 °C

a) Cooling effect of atmospheric gases by absorption (elimination) of heat.

On daytime the atmosphere reduces the received heat on surface of earth by more than 90 °C by absorption of heat.

This shows the extreme cooling effect by earth atmosphere.

The men-made increase of concentration of CO2- molecules by about 50% significantly reduced the global warming on earth and can be regarded as an overwhelming wonder of nature, which caused that the nature has enough time to adjust to the global warming.

The real main cause for global warming is natural, which is explained in a later chapter.

Two other crucial cooling effects:

b) High absorption potential of water surfaces

Another crucial cooling effect refers to the huge water areas. It is well known that water absorbs high amount of heat without being heated to high temperatures, which is quite different to absorption of sand , rock and soil.

c) Vegetation

It is also well known that vegetation (mainly wood) has an extremely strong cooling effect on climate, which occurs mainly by latent heat (=consumption of heat by evaporation of water). Latent heat is of course also an additional cooling effect by water surfaces.

* Nighttime effect

Warming of earth surface by about 160 °C.

a) Major effect: Release of heat from sea-water.

The stored heat in sea-water is transferred to the molecules of lower atmosphere and distributed by wind.

B1.4.8 The basic Error of Heat Radiation by Earth

As for other phenomenons also the most errors concerning climate refer to the unsuitability of our brains to describe observations without unreal thinking and to draw conclusions without unreal thinking. A wrong conclusion, which caused another fundamental error concerning cause for climate warming occurred by Stefan and Boltzmann concerning their derived formula for heat radiation.

Stefan and Boltzmann wrongly concluded that their measured correlation between radiated heat and temperature (= factor T to the power of 4) is valid for all temperatures, although measurements were done exclusively at very high temperatures.

All observations and scientific measurements prove, that the radiated heat from an object does not depend on the temperature of the heat-emitting body, but it depends on the difference of temperatures between the heat- emitting body and the temperature of the surroundings of the body. This means when the heat difference is near zero there occurs not any heat radiation, which is generally the case for heat radiation of earth surface.

It has to be mentioned that it is extremely unlikely that physicist have not detected this error, because it results to following nonsense: The amount of radiated heat from sun to earth is smaller than radiated heat from earth. Or rooms can be well heated by cold heating devices. So this is just one of uncountable physical errors, which has not been corrected despite refutation.

And this severe error of physicist is used to manipulate the common public to believe in the absurd theory of green-house theory.

Physical reality by logic: Radiation of particles like photons requires that the particles completely penetrate through omnipresent photons.

Complete penetration of particles requires

a) that the kinetic energy of colliding particles does not result during penetration to a minimal internal energy, which causes binding of particles or

b) that the kinetic energy of colliding particles does not result during penetration to zero kinetic energy because of increasing spin energies, which results to reflection of particles.

Particles like photons or molecules can do additional mutual bindings until the increased vibration energy by additional bindings cause the breaking of bondings and emissions of single particles. As altedy mentioned the phenomenon that binding is often followed by a breaking of bonding is called by SURe New Physics is called “bonding & decay” reaction.

Bonding & decay is the explanation for the observation that a group of unbound particles do Brownian movements, by which the values of kinetic energies of particles are averaged and the directions of kinetic energies get irregular.

Overall depending on difference of energies of emitted IR- photons these can either do radiation or are incorporated to omnipresent photons.

Emitted IR-photons can generate hear by absorption to atomic matter but are no heat, whereas the average kinetic energies of omnipresent photons is equivalent to heat.

The temperature difference between earth surface and surrounding air is nearly always so small that no radiation by earth surface occurs.

It is relative simple to determine the temperature difference by measurements which is required for radiation of heat. This would provide valuable data concerning heating. Important is, that the measurement has to be done by a contact thermometer, because an IR- thermometer does not measure omnipresent IR-photons (=heat), but emitted electron-pairs, which are decay particles of IR-photons and no heat. Other radiation of electron-pairs is radio radiation.

B1.4.9 The real Explanation of Cooling of Earth Surface

The real and well observed physical rule is: Heat is relative and always flows from a larger reservoir to a smaller reservoir to get adjustment of temperatures.

There is a huge reservoir of “heat” in space, which is – 270 °C. Thus there is a continuous flow of cold heat from space to the earth surface. This is the correct explanation of the observation that the temperature reduces by increasing altitude. Current explanation by lower density of air is physically impossible.

By sunshine the generated warm heat on earth surface reduces the cold flow from space. At night only clouds cause a significant reduction of cold flow.

Important is the fact, that the cooling of earth surface does not occur by radiation of heat.

B1.4.10 The Omission of the last argument for Greenhouse Theory

By the non-existence of heat radiation from earth surface the last argument for green-house theory is obsolete. When there is no heat radiation from earth surface, there can’t be no absorption, reflection, blocking or trapping of radiated heat from earth surface.

This is conform to the fact that radiated heat from earth has never been measured and can’t be measured. Heat measurements by satellites refer not to radiated IR-photons but to radiated electron-pairs, which are no heat and do not generate heat. There is just a rather poor correlation of emitted electron-pairs to heat of earth surface.

In order to measure IR-photons by an IR- spectrometer the detector of the spectrometer has to be real heat detector. Most new models of IR-spectrometers work with a detector which is just sensitive to electron-pairs, which means it does not measure absorption or emission of heat.

B1.4.11 Scientists seem to be aware of the Error of Greenhouse Theory

Scientists don’t use scientific terms anymore for explanation of the greenhouse theory like absorption or reflection of radiation. As these terms have a scientific definition it can be clearly refuted that these occur. Now scientists use unscientific terms like blocking or trapping of heat, which have just a physically impossible meaning, but no scientific definition, which makes it impossible to do a scientific refutation.

It is already very unscientific to use the term greenhouse effect although nearly all scientists know, that the heating of greenhouses is caused by a completely different effect, which is the prevention of convection of the heated air. Greenhouses even refute the greenhouse effect: By replacing the glassy roof panel by an identical panel except a stronger absorption potential it will be proven that by absorption the greenhouse is cooled.

B1.4.12 Falsifications of Temperatures to conceal the Error of Climate

By the natural characteristics of our brains we do not admit errors, when we can be sure that these are not discovered. This is particular the case for scientists, because of the thinking, that they lose reputation.

The error of the theory has such a great significance that it looks strongly like physicists falsified reported temperatures in order to avoid the detection of this error. The falsified temperatures are the temperatures of higher atmosphere. I still got knowledge of the logical real temperatures, which decreased nearly constantly from earth surface to space (- 270 °C). I got upset, when I noticed that in common physic books the real temperatures were changed to absurd physically impossible temperatures which are claimed to rise up to 1700 °C without any scientific explanation. Physicist should be aware that the real much cooler temperatures are unambiguously measurable by well calibrated contact thermometers and the wrong temperatures violate clearly physical rules of thermodynamics.

Thus the only reason seam to be that this was an act of desperation in order save the wrong greenhouse theory, which means that the common public is manipulated to the thinking that the high temperatures refer to the claimed trapping of radiated heat from earth surface.

For me this action shows that physicists got aware that they have not any scientific argument any more for the greenhouse theory and against the reality: the cooling effect by atmospheric CO2 on climate.

B1.4.13 We are lucky that there is nearly no Radiation from Atmosphere

Already Max Planck has found out that the temperature of emitted photons are determined by temperature of the emitting matter.

This means if the emitted photons at higher atmosphere would radiate to earth ground these would be either extremely cold by real temperatures of atmosphere or extremely hot by wrong temperatures, so in either case impossible for living. But as also the surrounding gases has same temperature emitted photons in atmosphere do not radiate, but are absorbed.

Different is the situation, when IR-photons from sun are absorbed by molecules in the upper atmosphere. By this the emitted photons have a temperature which refers to the average of absorbed energy and actual energies (real), which results towide range of minus-temperatures, but still higher than surrounding molrcules. Thus the emitted photons in minus range radiate to earth surface. But as soon there is a temperature level of identical temperatures, the photon is absorbed, so that the radiation stops.

But the level of about -3 °C is sometimes missing because of freezing and the rise of temperature to 0°C by heat of freezing. This means that photons with -3 °C reach the surface, while the surrounding temperatures are clearly above zero. This phenomenon is called ground frost. Ground frost is currently not understood. It is the only radiation from atmosphere and requires sunshine, which explains that groundfrost can be exclusively observed in the morning at sunrise.

B1.5 Laws of Nature are extremely Mankind friendly

B1.5.1 Observations clearly show that Climate Changes are natural

Physicists have achieved by extremely sophisticated analytical tools to determine which historic climate changes occurred since multiple thousand years. This clearly showed that climate changes always occurred and are natural. Thus it would be very unusual, when currently the climate would not change. In addition it is clearly observed that current climate conditions are in a very usual range.

B1.5.2 People want to report Catastrophes

Physicists should have valued the great experimental work of their colleagues to clearly report that the earth is in a phase of climate warming and that the actual conditions are quite normal and will strengthen in the next years, so that it can be expected that most of the ice on north-pole will melt which will result for example by experience that Greenland will be become a region, where agriculture and farming is possible.

But many people have advantages, when these make catastrophes out of normality. Media make most of their profit by catastrophic events, because it is natural that people want to be informed about actual and possible hazards. Scientist get more attention, when they report warnings instead reporting the reality that something is normality.

People also want to get quick explanations which tempted scientists to do hasty conclusions which later showed to be physically impossible. By media any statement of scientist are reported as fact, so that the common public gets quickly false information, which are undoubtedly believed. Thus within short time it is quasi impossible for scientists to report their unambiguous knowledge about physics, which proves that the first expressed assumption is wrong.

B1.5.3 Meanwhile Scientist just claim that CO2 accelerates Warming

Meanwhile most scientists admitted that the current climate change is still in a normal range of temperatures, but that the critical problem is that the quicly increased CO2concentration by fossile burning has accelerated the global warming. By this the nature is not capable anymore to adjust to the climate change.

But the claimed increased rate of warming is just a result of biased thinking. The available historic data can’t be used to compare with the latest real measurements of global average temperature, because of different methods.

But it can already be seen, that there is no significant difference in rate of warming.

The unambiguous reality is that the actual rate of warming would be stronger without men-made increase of CO2- concentration.

B1.5.4 The natural Mitigation of climate Changes by CO2

If CO2 would have a warming effect there would be a self-accelerating warming to much higher temperatures, which would cause nearly impossible living conditions.

In sea water of earth there are multiple times higher amounts of CO2 than in atmosphere. It is well known that by increasing temperature of water CO2 is outgassing from water to atmosphere. Thus nature has a very effective mechanism to mitigate all climate changes. It is clearly observed that after each climate change the amounts of CO2 in atmosphere is changed so that climate changes occur much slower and less intensive than without this effect of nature.

Another effective support of nature against climate changes occurs by outgassing of methane from frozen soil to atmosphere.

We can be sure that the nature works in favor for mankind, otherwise mankind or even all living beings would not exist.

B1.5.5 The Conclusion of the real Cause of climate Changes

As already mentioned there are reliable climate data available of the last few thousand years. The most important result is that climate changes occurred irregularly, which means without any constant time period. As scientists have not expected this they assumed that there are multiple constant periods, which they mainly explained by changes of orbital motions and inclination. This again shows the inadequacy of our brains to draw conclusions. Exactly the contrary can be concluded: Changes of orbitals and inclination can be clearly excluded. Such events require collisions to celestial bodies and will cause climate changes which have not any similarity to observed changes.

This also shows, that scientists think that they have to give explanations even, when it is impossible that these are reality. This is a typical behavior of mankind to do a random statement just to avoid to admit that an answer is not known. Particular this is done by scientists, because they feel incompetent without an answer. People have to learn that admitting of not knowing is much more competent than a non-scientific answer. This has caused many errors of current physics.

Overall there is clearly just one possibility of the cause for climate changes , which is conform to all observations. (Additional observations are that the maximal and minimal temperatures are nearly at the same level).

Actually the causes for climate changes are permanently directly observed and registered by research groups like at NASA: These are molecular clouds which propagate together with magnetic fields with different densities through space. Currently the density of molecules around sum system has been found extraordinarily low. Thus there is nearly no cooling effect by molecular clouds.

Molecular clouds are remnants of supernovae. Without these clouds the earth and other planets and moons would not exist.

We can be glad that the earth is in a region where there are no “heavy clouds”. Otherwise the climate changes would cause much stronger temperature differences.

There was a time when the sun system propagated through a spiral arm of our galaxy, which caused the phenomenon of snowball earth.

Of course we can already now get a reliable climate forecast, which means, for how many years we can enjoy the current warm period.

B1.5.6 The fatal Error of being threatened by Albedo

Also the reality of Albedo effect is not realized. Current claim that the Albedo effect accelerates climate warming is antiscience , because it has been refuted by unambiguous measurements. Measurements clearly prove that ice and snow just reflects visible photons, which do not refer to heat, whereas the reflection of heat by ice and snow is nearly zero.

By SURe-New Physics it can be logically explained by the detailed structures of water/ice molecules, that visible photons are reflected and that IR-photons are absorbed.

B1.5.7 The essential Stabilization of Climate by Ice of Poles

The huge ice areas on poles cause xtremely effective mitigation effects for global and seasonal climate changes by latent heat, which means by generation of heat (IR-photons) by freezing and consumption of heat (IR-photons) by melting.

This again proves that our brains are much more receptive for physically impossible catastrophic situations than for real mitigation effects.

B1.5.8 Mitigation of Change Sea Level by Antarctica

Antarctica is the only and greatest area where there is solid ground covered by ice, which participation always causes snow fall without a chance to get a fluid, even when the global climate gets much warmer

This causes that the effect of increasing sea water by melting of ice in Arctica is significantly reduced by accumulation of snow by increased precipitation of snow in Antarctica. This reduces strongly danger of flooding of land. Of course not completely.

Another very basic mitigation effect is that the increasing potential for generation of clouds abd rain by higher water temperatures is strongly reduces by clearing of clouds gy the higher intensities of IR-photons. This explains also that spring tomes get dryer and in autumn rainy days are increased, because then the temperature of sea water is still near maximum, while the intensity of heat radiation is already significantly reduced.

Thus the overall increase of rain is minimal.

B1.5.9 The Incredible Wonder of Increase of CO2

It is well known that in warm periods the number of humans is strongly increased because of the highly improved living conditions. The increasing number of human beings need more energy and heat for industry and living. Thus people produce more CO2 by burning, particular in the last decades.

It is known that plant growth is strongly determined by CO2. According to my own observations by trimming yearly hedges, shrubs and trees the increase of growth occurred proportional to increase of CO2, which means about 50%.

It can be estimated that by the 50% increase of CO2 a 30% increase of crop yield was achieved. CO2 is the limiting factor for plant growth.

By this it can be concluded that strongly increasing number of people mainly in poor counties much less suffered form starvation, because of the increase of CO2. Currently 9 million people die yearly by starvation.

It can be assumed that without the increase of CO2 there die at least 2 million people more per year by starvation.

We must become urgently aware, that reducing CO2 causes the acceleration of global warming and the dying of million of people.

This means that after getting knowledge of SURe- New Physics everyone, who still do actions against CO2 increase makes himself guilty for the potential or even probable death of many thousand people in poor countries.

In Germany any action to stop or reduce CO2 increase violates the Art. 20A of the Grundgesetz.

There are numerous refutations that CO2 causes global warming and numerous verfications that increase of CO2 has an unambiguous cooling effect.

SURe – New Physics has documented all refutations by about 150 chapters in SURe- New Physics Vol. C = The fatal Error of Climate Change.

B1.5.10 We now have to condition our Brains to Reality

The good think is, that by the knowledge of the real hazards for mankind our brains will realize physical reality. But still a conditioning is required, which has to be done by repeatedly reporting the hazards and catastrophic situations by not accepting the reality of our universe.

Also for me an extensive training was necessary to realize completely physical reality. I had to do several hundred revisions of SURe -New Physics until SURe-New Physics did not contain any theory any more. This explains the needed full-time research over 11 years.

For the training it helps to think that the knowledge of physical reality avoids great disadvantages for all of us and for the complete nature.

The best way to condition my brain to physical reality was, that the repeated thinking that physical reality is extremely valuable for all people and the complete nature.

In order to support the acceptance of SURe- New Physics, I guarantee that Sure-New Physics describes and explains by over 95% the reality of the universe. If more than 5% of all statements of SURe- New Physics will be scientifically refuted I will do a donation of totally 70,000 Euro for reforestation of rain forest, which is the most effective action against global warming.

B1.6 The Theory of a Supernatural Power (God)

B1.6.1 We don’t know, what is beyond our Universe

There are following reasons, why our universe has to have a specific volume (a), why it has to have a solid wall (b) and why the wall can’t expand or contract (c):

a) The matter in universe is 3-dimensional and infinity is physical impossible (can’t be physically explained)

b) The density of the containing matter, particular omnipresent photons are in average stable, otherwise many physical rules would not be constant.

c) There is no energy and no force, which could explain acceleration to different shapes of volume.

Thus there is a space, which is our universe and another space beyond our universe.

Mankind can gain only knowledge of the universe, we are living in. Thus we don’t know the physical reality what is outside of our universe. Some conclusions can be drawn, which have a high probability to be reality, but still have to be called theories.

Most people believe in the theory, that there is a supernatural force, which they call god, but there are many different theories about a god.

B1.6.2 Why do many people believe in God?

Mostly human beings believe in god because of the improved feeling by thinking that there is someone who might help in critical situations.

Although having no religion, I have a very firm belief in god, as my experience Is, that in my life there were many situations, which occurred in favor for me although the probability was very low.

At the same time I believe that god can do no action in our universe, which is not conform to the fundamental laws of nature. This believe can be concluded by the observation, that in universe not any interaction has occurred till now, which is physical impossible. This means that I believe that god is not almighty.

B1.6.3 Some Events occurred, which are physical impossible

These events are:

- Creation of time, which results to the fact, that interactions are possible and that each interaction requires a specific time span from cause to effect.

- Creation of the specific 3-dimensional space of the universe by creation of a so called outer limit,

Comments: Whereas the limit cannot be descibable, there has to be an inner limit which can be described and explained by SURe: Shortly after the generation of matter in the generated space, the matter (electrons) do bondings, by which a huge inner wall was built out of frozen photons (matter of black holes). By this the space beyond our universe is not observable, while the inner wall of the universe is well describable and observable. (see SURe - New-Physics Vol. ASTROPHYSICS).

- Creation of the two fundamental Laws of Nature, which determine all interactions in universe (including generation of universe).

- Creation of nothing. Comment: We only are aware that nothing is no observable matter and no observable energy. But we don’t know if it is something else. There are indications, that this is the case.

The listed actions are not conform to fundamental laws of nature, but might be possible, because these were done outside the universe, which means before generation of matter and energy in universe.

So by this there is a strong indication that an external force / god beyond the universe exists.

B1.6.4 Some Events in Universe are statistically impossible

There are some events, which occurred in universe, which were physically possible but clearly statistically impossible:

- * The generation of spin-energies, which all have the same size and the same speed of self rotation. Comment: If this would be not the case, the universe would be chaotic because of much too many possibilities of different interactions. Nothing would be reproducible and nothing could be described by a common rule.

- The generation of living beings.

- The generation of a planet like earth, which fulfills all requirements for generation of living beings.

- The generation of living beings, which are capable for complex thinking.

- The conversion of physics to antiscience

- The late detection of physical reality.

These events can only be explained by the theory that there is a supernatural force/ god, who can control the probability of interactions in universe.

But this is not conform to the determination of interactions.

B1.6.5 Loophole of Determinism can be used to control Events

There is an extremely small “loophole” of determinism which is caused by the two fundamental laws of nature. The loophole refers to the vibration of a bonding:

There is a very small possibility that a vibration is generated with an amplitude, which is exactly the maximal amplitude. So there is a 50% possibility that the bonding breaks and a 50% possibility that there is another vibration by which there is again such a ratio of subsequent reactions and so on.

As the time duration of a vibration is extremely low, the delay of time is statistically extreme small, so that determination is not affected.

But when an external force /god is able to change the statistical probability, it would be possible to extend the time duration of such a vibration to any extend. By this there would be a possibility to have a limited control of interactions in universe without violation of the fundamental laws of nature.

B1.6.6 Many indications, that there is a mankind-friendly God

There is are many observations, that the matter and energy of the universe exist in a way that it is in favor of living beings.

Examples are:

* Stars generate constantly a very stable rate of energy over extreme long times. This is a very complicated process. Usually this is nearly impossible by nature and even by technical devices it is difficult.

It has to be considered that stars have no advantage by the stability of generated heat.

* Additional to the fact that we are ware lucky that the earth is in a galactic region, where there occure very moderate climate changes because there are no heavy intergalactic molecular clouds, there are lots of mitigations effects like by CO2 transfers between sea water and atmosphere.

People, who don’t believe in god, might call the mitigation effects of climate changes like by CO2 an unexplained incredible climate wonder, but this is not at all a climate catastrophe.

B1.6.7 Is God the Root Cause for the late Discovery of Reality?

My personal thinking is that the late discovery of physical reality have such a low probability to occur that there must be another basic explanation. Also other events in universe have such a low probability, so that these can’t be explained like the evolution to living beings.

Events with extreme low probability can’t be explained by physical reality, so that there has to be a theory, which is only possible by a supernatural force/ god which is exerted from outside the universe.

Therefore I firmly believe in a supernatural force/ god, who has caused that the physical reality of the universe has not been detected earlier. And I believe that this was done in favor of mankind.

By this believe we should not look back and try to define explanations for the inability to detect physical reality of the universe. We should just say that there was a long time period where human beings had not the capability/ allowance to realize reality and that we now have got the capability/ allowance to realize reality.

I myself was not excluded. I did not manage to discover SURe- New Physics despite extensively physical studies for many years.

I suffered several personal drawbacks, which caused me that I had to pause my physical work: burnout by extreme workload, severe heart attack, cancer and dead of my wife and three brain strokes. After each event I thought, that this was a sign, that the supernatural force/ god does not want, that the physical reality is disclosed. I would have stopped my physical work forever, when I would not have had in the time of pausing the strange experience that I got overnight ideas which solved important physical non- conformities. This subconscious experience I interpreted as sign to continue my work. But I lived steadily with the fear that my “work and ability of thinking” might experience a sudden complete termination, because the way how the universe works should be kept as a secret for ever.

There are understandable reasons, why the disclosure of the universal physical reality happened now and not earlier or later. We should consider the detection of the Fundamental Laws of Nature as a divine gift for all of us. Now we all have to stick together and do what we ought to do. Every scientist has an extreme high responsibility now to lead us through the new age of knowledge of physical reality.

B1.7 The crucial Benefits of Physical Reality (SURe – New Physics)

B1.7.1 It is high Time to free Scientists from Remorse and Frustration

The victims of current physics are all scientists. For these it is not possible to get fulfillment and proud by achieving valuable findings for mankind. Instead their great intellectual capabilities are wasted to create physically impossible science-fiction.

If physicists would have been allowed to report the finding that nearly all generated particles in colliders are photons, this would have resulted to the knowledge how the immense amounts of “clean” energy of sun is generated and further experiments would have been done to define the optimal conditions to generate high amounts of energy by low costs. Thus it would have made possible that extremely effective and “clean” power plants would have been built already before 60 years.

The real process of energy generation in sun atmosphere is nearly the same process which occur in high energetic colliders: High energetic collisions to magnetic fields.

B1.7.2 Its SURe: The Begin of a golden Era for Physicists

In the last years there have been many important new developments of technologies. Fortunately engineers can do outstanding developments by observation of physical effects without knowing the scientific explanations of the occurring interactions. Observed physical effects are always physical reality and thus can lead to new technologies. But the potential and rapidity for developments of new technologies is greatly amplified by knowledge of the physical mechanisms.

Overall by knowing of the the general rules of the universe (=physical reality) will lead to an incredible explosion of new technologies which are very important for mankind.

By SURe- New Physics physicists can concentrate their skills to make their ideas of new technical applications reality. Instead of lots of papers about theories they can work on problem solving for the health of mankind.

Work of physicists does not depend any more on financial support by public institutions. They really earn money by what they do because their work can be sold. Many new companies will be founded, which need physicists for development. Physicists will earn much more money than now, because their skills will be urgently needed. The authors of SURe- New Physics can present long lists of examples for new and useful technologies based on SURe- New Physics .

Another benefit of SURe- New Physics is that physicist and other scientists will have the fundamental knowledge of doing R&D in all areas of natural science. Particularly R&D for biology and medical science urgently needs this fundamental knowledge of physicists.

There are just 5 different interactions in universe, which simplifies research for all natural sciences. This will reveal possibilities for development of effective therapies against all kind of diseases like cancer and dementia. There will be a revolution of new machines for diagnosing deceases or identifications of molecules and atoms. There will be new application which at the moment are inconceivable.

Therefore mankind needs thousands of new scientists who do R&D based on SURe- New Physics. Of course less physicists for fundamental theoretical research will be needed. But also their research is still important to improve and extent New SURe- New Physics. There are still very specific observations which have to be explained by fundamental laws of nature.

We don’t have to fear that the era of “old physics” will get a negative touch in history. Like the Greek mythology obsolete physics will be regarded as an interesting epoch in history without any negative emotions. It will still be an epoch, which is interesting for people and people want to get knowledge about. The most important learning of this epoch is that errors are natural and are an unavoidable part of excellent physical research, which has not to be criticized.

B1.7.3 A Flood of new Patent Applications

It is obvious that by knowledge of SURe- New Physics there will be an uncountable number of ideas for new technologies, for which successful application is very sure. Concerning patent applications until now my opinion was that the disclosure of physical reality has not been done for the benefit of a few persons but for all persons on earth. But now I have decided to do some patent applications mainly in order to speed ip the conversion of physics to SURe- New Physics.

B1.7.5 Erroneous Physics will not be published any more

By fundamental laws of nature (Weltformel) all physical errors and faults can easily be detected without being an expert of a specific area of physics. Therefore publications will be checked prior to publications, whether these are conform to statements. Everything which does not comply to Weltformel is no physical reality. Even experimental refutations won't be needed, but of course can be done.

By this there will be no covering up of faults any more.

B1.7.6 The Weltformel will cause a Revolution in all natural Sciences

All natural sciences work by the two Fundamental laws of Nature and thus by the 5 interactions determined by the Weltformel. Thus in principle there is no difference of scientific research of all natural sciences. Main research of all natural sciences refer to particle reactions. By the strong restrictions to just 5 interactions, it should be much easier to find the explanations for observations. There will be many new and improved technologies for observations. An extreme high number of additional research scientist will be needed after the Weltformel has been detected because of highly increase possibilities to do successful research with valuable findings. Funding of research will mainly taken over by industry, as research will mostly result to new valuable applications for mankind.

B1.7.7 The huge new Research Potential for Chemistry

By Weltformel there is no difference between chemistry and physics any more. Nearly all physical interactions refer to chemical reactions, based on collisions of particles with subsequent building and breaking of bondings. Chemical research will benefit by the exact structures of atomic particles. Also the optimal conditions for reactions are known without testing. The detailed structures of heavy nuclei have still to be determined, but this is just a matter of time.

As for determination of atomic structures mainly time is needed and just basic knowledge about characteristics of different elements, my daughter took over this task and still works on this. Latest achievement was the determination of the structure of gold.

By the knowledge of the real structures of nuclei it can be concluded which nucleus can bind to another nucleus so that a valuable nucleus can be generated. Thus it is really possible to generate gold or other valuable elements by a binding reaction of usual elements. This opens unimagined possibilities also to produce rare earth without mining.

Also energy generation works by reactions and thus by basic chemistry. All rules of chemical reactions comply to Weltformel. As already mentioned this includes also the absolutely wrong theory that by nuclear fusion energy is generated. Instead of bonding reaction, decay reaction have to be used.

B1.7.8 The huge new Research Potential for Biology

Scientific research for biology is much more challenging than for physics as there are much more chemical reactions and much more complex structures of particles. Therefore many additional observations have to be done in order to define the mechanisms of interactions.

But the Weltformel should be a strong help for this. In addition it can be expected that in near future by SURe many highly improved technologies can be developed so that the experimental observations can be extended to new areas and accuracy which will offer incredible sophisticated analytical possibilities.

As by SURe – New physics it is known, that data transfer in space , in wire and in nerves are done by same particles, which are electron-pairs, it will be possible in near future to construct a mini- interface of a usual receiving antenna of a smartphone in our brain to nerves so that the signa goes directly into our brains. This will for example improve our biological senses to be even more sensitive than the best biological sensory organ.

By this also blind people can see again and deaf people can hear again.

B1.7.9 The huge new Research Potential for Medicine

The most benefits for mankind will be achieved by the Weltformel in the area of medicine.

General examples are:

- Development of highly improved diagnostic devices and procedures.

- Getting detailed knowledge of biological interactions. Comment: Like it was not possible till now to explain physical interactions, it is not possible to explain biological interactions

- Conclusions for most effective treatments and medication.

B1.7.10 Weltformel can save Mankind from Hazards

Technical processes and application can generate particles like radiation, which might be hazardous. As by Weltformel it is known, which particles are generated and which are the criteria, that hazards can occur for mankind.

Currently the criteria are not known. Mostly it is stated that the hazard refers to ionization of biologic matter.

The physical reality of ionization is that a bonding between atomic nucleus and a photon-chain is broken. This is directly no problem. The problem is that an atomic nuclei without a photon-chain is a so called radical, which can do further actions which can be hazardous. Ionization is only one possible hazardous reaction. In principle all reactions with penetrated particles can be hazardous. In addition it is not quite clear, when ionization occurs.

The overall rules for a hazardous radiation is:

* All radiated particles which are absorbed by our body, can be hazardous. Absorption means that the emitted particle binds with the biological matter, by which particles can be generated, which disturb the processes in our body.

* All radiated particles which penetrate completely through our body are not hazardous, because these cause not any interaction in our body. Only a bonding reaction can cause hazards.

Thus by this knowledge a basic tests for hazards is absorption spectroscopy. Well known is that absorption depends on the kinetic energy of the radiated particle: Only specific kinetic energies are absorbed.

Generally absorption occurs when the kinetic energy is equivalent to the vibration energy of the bonding. The vibration energy of the bonding increases by mass of nuclei. Therefore high energetic radiation is absorbed only by heavy nuclei, which are very rare in our body. Thus it is an error that gamma-photons have a high potential to cause hazards for mankind. Nearly all gamma-photons penetrate through our body without any impact.

Concerning radiated electron-pairs (radio radiation) it is known that these are absorbed by heavy metals like iron. Therefore it has to be tested by absorption spectroscopy whether blood absorbs radio radiation.

Current testing procedure for radiation of smart-phones refers to measurements of strength of generated magnetic fields. But this do not make sense as magnet fields are no hazards, and also do not correlate to hazards.

Therefore this can be eliminated. It just leads to a false thinking that everything is safe. There is a high probability for this but it is not sure.

Overall the testing is now done involuntary by all people and nobody can escape from this test. The result of the test is not clear up to now.

B1.7.11 No Disputes anymore about Physics

Validity (=physical reality) of assumptions, interpretations, hypotheses and theories can be discussed by different argumentation, whether these are reality or not. But as physical reality is unique it can not be discussed. Of course specific statements might be no reality because of the erroneous thinking that the statement is conform to fundamental laws of nature. In this case it will be corrected. When two different statements are conform to the Weltformel, an experimental test should be done which is suitable to refute one statement.

B1.7.12 All physical Research will become useful

By physical reality most theoretical research can be replaced by new useful tasks mainly by development of new technologies. By this immense high costs are saved, as nearly all tasks will be requested and paid by companies.

B1.8 Earlier Finding of Physical Reality would have caused a Catastrophe

B1.8.1 The fast technological Development would create chaos

As soon as scientist get aware of physical Reality, they know everything what is possible by technical applications and how this can be constructed. The technological developments of last 80 years would have been achieved in probably about 20 years on average.

Nearly all current technologies had to be build by try and error, which took an extensive work and time for developing these. So there was enough time to get familiar to these. This will completely change. Advanced new technologies will be available within few months.

Everyone can imagine the serious problems, when the technological developments in one’s life would be such quick.

Just a few example:

* There would be so many patent application, that patent offices would be extremely overloaded. There would be lot of trouble and quarrels by this.

* Only the very big companies with have enough money could have afforded to develop after short time improved technologies without earning much money by the former technique. All small companies would have gone bankrupt.

* Many people get mentally over-strained by the flood of new applications and get frustrated, specifically in their jobs.

* New technologies would not bring joy and happiness to people, because it is nothing special.

Overall living would cause much more trouble than satisfaction and joy.

It would have been a disaster for mankind.

Now most basic technologies are available. Based on physical reality there will be still many very valuable new technologies, but not such a flood. Most are even expected with joyful anticipation.

B1.8.2 The Increase of CO2 would have not occurred

By observations of sun, it would have been possible, that physicist got very early aware, how the sun generates high amounts of permanent heat without complicated technique. T buold a power plant based om the mechanism in sun is simpler thab a nuclear fission plant. By this nobody would have generated heat by the ineffective burning of fossil fuels.

Thus the strong CO2 increase would have not occurred. By this the global warming would have occurred faster and temperatures would be higher.

The real catastrophe would occur, because the plant growths would be strongly reduced compared to now. 9 million people die now per year because of starvation, by knowledge of physical reality this would be many more.

That this has been not prevented can be regarded as an incredible wonder for mankind. 50% more CO2 in atmosphere means up to 50% increased plant growth and a corresponding increase of crop yield.

fdes the gamines there would be stong struggles by fighting of poor countries against rich countries, This was strongly needed to avoid severe disasters by famines of the increasing population of earth, which is known to occur in warm periods.

This has saved millions of people from severe famines and saved their lives.

By the knowledge of physical reality we now know that we have immediately These are variations of densities of molecular clouds in Sun system and thus the variation of heat absorption by molecular clouds. It has been clearly measured by NASA that currently the density of molecules is extraordinarily low, which explains current warm period of climate.

We are strictly obliged to immediately stop to support the “climate catastrophe” by actions to reduce CO2. We do the contrary what we intend to do!

By physical reality we have the knowledge that climate changes are natural like weather changes and that we have many possibilities to do actions to adjust to the climate so that we can live in harmony of the nature. Of course we have to stop all actions which will cause the catastrophe which we want to prevent.

By knowledge that we can be lucky and grateful hat the CO2 increase has occurred. the generated we can now life without the serious fears, which were generated by the scientific errors.

B1.8.3 Atomic Bombs would be available by every country

Extremely effective atomic bombs could have been constructed by every country, as every scientists would know, how to construct these much simpler than now. For this it would even not needed to use radioactive material any more. The use of such bombs would even not prevented by scrupels, as the “clean” bombs cause high damage of infrastructure, but no dying by radioactive contamination.

By the strong difference between dying people by starvation in poor countries and luxurious life in rich countries poor countries would feel unfairly disadvantaged and there would be a high probability of severe armed conflicts. These would also be caused by many other reasons, as it is observed also currently.

It can be assumed that in current days the conflicts have good chances to be solved by diplomacy of responsible politicians. By invention of new technologies and much less expensive costs for energy generation based on the knowledge of physical reality all countries would be richer than now.

B1.9 Later Acceptance of Reality would be a Catastrophe

B1.9.1 The Situation of Physics has changed

The most important finding of SURe- New Physics is that the current situation of physics is nobodies fault and no one can be blamed by this. The progression of physics is predetermined. So till now the time had not come to detect the physical reality of our universe. There were more advantages than disadvantages for mankind, but since now it would be a catastrophe for mankind when the physical reality would have not detected and will not be accepted by mankind. Instead of working together with the nature to fight agaist climate warming, we do great expensive efforts to fight unconsciously against the fundamental laws and the nature and the most valuable molecule, which creator of the nature has created. When this is not as soon as possible stopped, thousands of people in the poor countries we are threaten the live of thousands of people in poor countries.

B1.9.2 We urgently need Scientists for Biology and Medicine

Most research work is needed for biology and medicine to get detailed knowledge of the reality of living beings and complete nature. Based on physical reality many new knowledge and technical applications for the benefit of mankind will be achieved.

On the other side it can be assumed that more than 20 billion Euro per year are funded by public to verify physical impossibilities, 1.3 billion Euro alone for CERN.

As already mentioned by high energetic collisions not any particle – particle collision is physically possible because of penetration. The generation of decay particles of accelerated particles can be unambiguously refuted by running just one single beam by LHC.

By physical reality it is no problem at all, that any physical scientist can do valuable research concerning biology and medicine. The only intellectual skill is to be capable to draw unambiguous conclusions from unambiguous observations.

B1.9.3 Physicists have to be freed from the Ban of scientific research

Victims of the taboo of admitting errors are the physicists. Physicists are quasi not allowed to use their great intellectual skills for doing physical research. This caused for example that at CERN multiple thousands physicists are doing the same analytical work and get the same results for each experiment.

It is understandable that these can’t report the reality, which is:

* Since over 60 years they get the same results and the same particles, which are nearly all photons with some decay particles of photons, which are muons and neutrinos.

* The generated particles are independent from accelerated particles like electrons, positrons, muons, protons, antiprotons, lead atoms.

* The generated particles are nearly independent from claimed kinetic energy.

* Multiple million times lower kinetic energies will show no difference in results.

The error, which caused, that all measurements by high energetic collisions are worthless, is, that our brains are not suitable to conclude from unambiguous observations, that high energetic particle-particle collisions are physically impossible, because the particles penetrate without any interactions.

The generation of multiple photons are caused by decays of electromagnetic fields. Electromagnetic fields consists like magnetic fields of structures of bound photons. Unfortunately physicists have not realized, that the generation of photons is just an equipment effect.

* The used magnets for LHC deflect all particles in the same direction and the deflections are independent from direction of movement.

By this theory physicists at CERN could not do any research anymore, because all observations would uncover the wrong theories of quarks, gluons and Co.

By knowledge of SURe – New Physics no experiments are needed anymore.

It is unambiguously known that the observed particles in the analyzer are nearly all photons. Some photons decay to muons and electron-pairs. Muom and electron-pairs =neutrinos are reported. The question is, why it is not reported that nearly all decay products are photons.

Physicists had the wrong thinking that the various directions of deflections are caused by many separate particles. So by the wrong thinking they could state that a proton does not contain one uniform mass. But despite of this, because of the multiple deflections they had to revise their original theory, that there are just 3 quarks in a proton This seems to be the reason, why physicists claimed after the measurement, that the three quarks could not be observed added afteran indefinite number of gluons and an indefinite number of so called sea quarks to the three normal quarks.

Scientific work would be to do multiple measurements by particles, for which different quarks are claimed to contain and compare results.

Fact is that the only measurement result, which I have found after long searching, showed a centrally symmetric distribution.

This shows that not only the statement is antiscience, but also the verification of the statement is antiscience.

Another physically impossible theory is the theory of confinement. Not only chemist know that every particle is stable as a single and separate particle and can be isolated.

Confinement can be regarded as the admitting of physicists, that quarks do not exist.

In addition in chemistry it is known that for each decay reaction there is a reverse bonding reaction possible.

* Electrons and positrons can bind to all known matter.

* Electrons and positrons are the only elementary particles.

* Electrons and positrons were the first generated particles in universe.

* Usual building and breaking of bondings occur instead of a physically impossible magics of weak and strong force.

Later I detected one serious error: by deflection in magnetic field it can be unambiguously proved that by decay of electron-neutrinos (= electron-pairs) either two electrons or two positrons are generated but never an electron and a positron. The decay to one electron and one positron refers to the biased thinking that charges exist and that bindings are caused by opposite charges.

In addition I could show that the difference between electron and positron is exclusively that these do opposite spin rotation. As the direction of a spin rotation is just a matter of view and changes by turning particles upside down, matter and antimatter particles are identical particles. Thus the term positron has been eliminated.

Unfortunately physicists did not realize the clear conclusion of findings: everything in universe consists of bound electrons which means that by the findings the evolution of the matter in universe from first particles to current status can be concluded by simple bindings of electrons, which will be explained later.

B1.10 The Organizing of Conversion to Reality

B1.10.1 Announcement of Weltformel and SURe - New Physics

An international group of well renowned scientists shall arrange a press conference at a renowned international research facility like CERN, where the most responsible manager presents the announcements of Weltformel and New Physics by SURe.

The announcement should be done by following information:

By over 30 years of physical research it has been finally achieved ti determine to determine the most general natural laws which rule the universe and which describe and explain all physical interactions and physical states in universe. There are just two fundamental natural laws which are called “Weltformel” (formula of the world) .

This has been carefully reviewed by being conform to more than 500 relevant physical interaction. The application of Weltformel resulted to new physical laws by which all interactions in universe get improved descriptions and explanations, which represent the scientific universal reality and are called SURe – New Physics.

The detection of the Weltformel was possible because of the available scientific research work of physical scientists since beginning of physical research, which means that SURe – New Physics is completely based on the scientific research work of all physical scientists.

As SURe - New Physics has solved most unexplained issues of current physics ,physicists can concentrate on technical applications based on sure reality.

This will lead to an “explosion” of new technologies in the next years. By this Weltformel and SURe New Physics have the potential that all people of the earth get optimal living conditions which prevent all problems up to wars because of unequal living conditions in different countries. This would be otherwise the major danger of a peaceful future of mankind.

B1.10.2 Premises and first Tasks for Conversion

The premises for the conversion of current physics to SURe – New Physics:

* The conversion has to be carefully planned by responsible persons particular at research and education facilities and in policy.

* Every scientist shall have on long term more advantages than disadvantages by conversion. This includes reputation, earnings, responsibility level.

* All people shall have advantages by conversion.

Tasks for conversion:

* The importance of conversion has to make clear to all scientists and to general public.

* Each research facility has to work out new valuable tasks for research which can result to valuable technical applications.

* New research tasks have to be coordinated among research facilities.

.* Experimental facilities should be modified step by step, so that useful research can be done by available equipment.

* The new tasks should already be planned together with companies, which have an interest in specific new applications and are willing to support this.

* There will be a lot of ideas to build new technologies. It should be checked if the patenting system can be globally improved.

* Plan research work for extension of SURe – New Physics (see next chapter).

B1.10.3 Further Extension of SURe- New Physics

All observations by physical scientists, which are not covered by current document of SURe- New Physics, shall be converted to descriptions an explanations by Weltformel by physicist, which have done the studies and then published. It should be noted, when there might be more possibilities for explanations by Weltformel. When no explanation can be found, just the unbiased observation has to be published and if applicable partly explanation by Weltformel.

The review system for publications should be changed to check compliance to physical reality (SURe).

Many measurements and tests have to be done to get additional knowledge and to correct wrong data like for atomic weights. These are exclusively possible by comparing weights of educts and products of chemical reactions

Lots of studies have to be done to find analytical procedures which are suitable for measurements to determine real characteristics and corresponding data for subatomic or atomic particles.

B1.10.4 The new Research Tasks for physical Scientists

As already mentioned in previous chapter the new tasks for scientists of natural sciences is to find out the descriptions and explanations of observed interactions conform to reality which is determined by the Weltformel. If there is more than one solution there have to be done additional observations by targeted experimental work to find out which is the real determined solution by Weltformel. Calculations by Weltformel might also be possible.

The different conditions should be determined, which differentiates between different solutions of the Weltformel.

Concerning observations it is important that no interpretations are allowed but just pure and sure descriptions. This is not an easy task. Most current observations are no real observations but interpretations.

Thus there will be no fictive research any more to propose theories and there will be no more discussions about the reality of theories.

Main tasks of scientists will be in future to work on applications of physics. The knowledge of the reality of interactions will offer an incredible number of new technological applications. Thus there will be an overwhelming flood of new technologies which improve and assure the quality of life for mankind in future.

B1.10.5 Great Physicists will remain great Physicists

By SURe- New Physics all the great physical theories are “history”. This should not be considered negatively. Historic physics has to be regarded as extreme exciting and immutable epoch in history of mankind. For physicists this epoch required much higher intellectual skills than by New Physics. Historic physics was extreme complex and difficult stuff, so every physicists had to have outstanding intellectual skills to get a physicists. “Historic” physicists will be forever admired for their work. All great accomplishments of physical research will remain great accomplishments and all acknowledgments will remain to be regarded as exceptional and well deserved for ever.

Nevertheless SURe- New Physics uses expressions like antiscience for historic physics. But this does not really refer to historic physics. This shall just make clear that when historic physics is continued as usual physics it will turn to antiscience and only in this case all the great historic scientific work of physicists will be regarded as antiscience. Great physicist have the intellectual skills to realize, that up to now they have to work on basis of New Physics. If they are not willing to realize the reality of New Physics they will loose all their reputations and disqualify themselves as scientist

B1.11 My Support to avoid a Catastrophe

B1.11.1 High Efforts to achieve general Acceptance of Physical Reality

B1.11.2 I will donate 80,000 € for the Refutation of SURe – New Physics

Because of the high importance that physics converts to physical reality, I decided to arouse interest to get knowledge of physical reality, so that physicists support a quick conversion to physical reality.

As physicists will realize in few minutes that physical reality is based on pure mechanics, it will be no problem for them to understand the difference between physical reality and physically impossible theories. But of course the brains of physicist will have the same problems like mine, to replace all physical impossible theories. But by careful reading without prejudices this should be possible.

Usually physicists can differentiate, whether a statement is physical reality or fictive unreality.

SURe is also understandable for people who have no advanced knowledge of physics. Actually people who have very little knowledge of physics will understand physical reality partly quicker than physicist, because replacing knowledge is much more difficult than adding knowledge.

SURe- New Physics has to be announced as soon as possible by politicians and scientists in media. Politicians in Germany are even obliged to do actions like asking physicists for a review by a written evaluation. This is required by Art. 20A GG (Grundgesetz).

Before conversion, there has to be a multiple international conference with recognized scientists of as many countries as possible.

In order to emphasize that my statements are reality, I will donate 80,000 EUR for the reforestation of rain forests after scientists could present ten scientific experimental refutations of different statements of the multiple hundred statements of SURe- New Physics. The amount will be transferred to a public account. A contract will specify the corresponding power of disposal.

Refutations are also very important for SURe – New Physics in order that the statements can be corrected. Therefore additional 200€ will be donated directly after a justification of a first scientific refutation of a statement of SURe, which is no typing error. The scientist, who does the refutation have to agree that his name and his research facility or company is provided.

The support of reforestation is the only effective action against negative impacts of climate warming.